Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Hunter S. Thompson and the culture of violence

I just finished reading the new Rolling Stone magazine with the feature article on Hunter S. Thompson. Specifically I want to talk about the prediction he made while traveling with and writing about the Hells Angels. When Dr. Bob Geiner asked Hunter why he was writing about “that bunch of losers,” Hunter replied because that is where the future is going. And isn’t that so very true? Kesey, Jerry Garcia, and many others in the 60s “peace movement” believed that the only way for “peace” to be achieved was for the Hells Angels and other such groups to cooperate with one another. But what happens when those trying to bring about a change as monumental as peace meet a long established tradition such as violence? The peace movement is silently subverted, while its momentum shifts to the more entrenched movement—violence in this case—and propels it to even greater legitimacy.

Look around, where are the Vietnam-style protests over the Iraq war? They are virtually non-existent. What does the vast majority of full-length feature films contain? Copious amounts of violence, with little emphasis on truly human desires of compassion, good will, etc. Movies like Across the Universe which seek to expose war for what it is and humans desirous of peace are not exposed to a large audience, but rather to a select few theaters across the country. Nietzsche said that the ascetic ideal is the artist and that the artist must avoid being corrupted by materialism. Maybe the modern ascetic ideal is the peacenik and it is absolutely imperative that the peaceniks avoid corruption by the entrenched violence that our culture loves so much. It is a rather strange phenomenon is it not, the extent to which violence pervades American culture? America has 10X more fatal shootings than does the next closest “industrialized” country. Domestic violence is on the rise, not on the fall. America deals more small arms throughout the world than any other country in the entire world. Our total spending by the Department of Defense (why did we change the name from Department of War?) is, since the illegal invasion of the sovereign nation of Iraq, over 600 billion dollars annually—ANNUALLY! That is more than the next 18 closest military budgets, including India and China, the two biggest countries in the world. I believe I read a statistic somewhere that said that the average American home possesses at least 2 guns. So was Hunter right in his rather presumptuous prediction? Most definitely.

And then people like Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, and the rest of Satan’s crew (disguised in the teachings of Jesus) want to talk about traditional family values and other such nonsense! There is this belief that Europe is entering a state of depravity and decadence because the accept nudity and human sexuality. But aren’t those things inherently human? While violence (at least to the extent that we have carried it) is certainly not. Traditional family values to these people entail the subservience of the woman to the man, the proliferation of intolerance and racism, and the inability to think for oneself—and then we wonder why violence (and especially hate crimes) is on the rise. To hell with traditional family values as these people preach them. There are much, much, much more important problems to be dealt with.

2 comments:

-Dani said...

I can't help but wonder if violence isn't, more or less, something we're born with. All you need to do is watch kids at 'recess' at any school (I can say this with some confidence having now been at schools with 'recess' in 3 countries and several cultures). The violence and outright cruelty exhibited by some children on others is shocking. I don't think I could pin point where the root of this inherent need for violence comes from, but it certainly exists in all of us - I'd argue. This conclusion leads me to a more comic understanding of war on the "world's stage." They're just temper tantrums thrown by the powerful "gimme, gimme, gimme, I want, I want" etc. It's nothing more than a mean game children play at recess...only on a grander scale where victory is measured in lives destroyed. The real question may be, why do some of us chose to rid ourselves of these violent tendencies and 'tow the line' and why do others listen to what I'd argue becomes an internal blood lust?

Yesterday at my largest school of over 1,200 learners a boy came into the 'office area' sobbing. He was a good 5 inches taller than I...in grade 7 and he was sobbing like a first grader. A teacher was yelling at him in Setswana to stop crying and shut up. I tried to hide in a corner so as not to embarrass the boy more by finding out he was sobbing in front of the "lekgoa." I kept hearing him mumble over and over "di tonky, di tonky." The donkey? I figured he must have been kicked by one - as they are everywhere and are known to kick when frightened. The teachers were all making fun of him so he finally left the office still crying inconsolably. I asked a teacher if he was going to be okay, what was wrong? She said he was fine, but he just found out that a few boys from his class had gone to his house and killed his pet donkey during the break. She found this humorous. I sat there dumb struck. It made me sick to my stomach...it still does actually. Violence to animals RARELY stops there. What is it in these 12/13 year old boys that would make them take pleasure in murdering an innocent animal? Where will that desire take them? What is to become of this world?

Pawley said...

Is this the same Hunter Thompson who was savagely beaten by the Hells Angles because he wouldn't share the profits from his writing? Thought so. And he felt –they- were the wave of the future? Then others "believed that the only way for “peace” to be achieved was for the Hells Angels and other such groups to cooperate with one another."

The kindest thing I can say about their ideas is that that’s really quite unintelligent.

You ask "what happens when those trying to bring about a change as monumental as peace meet a long established tradition such as violence?"

Wasn't this question answered by Jesus 2000 years ago, and then more recently by Gandhi?

You posit a relationship between traditional family values and violence: "Traditional family values to these people entail the subservience of the woman to the man, the proliferation of intolerance and racism, and the inability to think for oneself—and then we wonder why violence (and especially hate crimes) is on the rise."

Maybe the key qualifier is "to those people", but that's an awfully long leap of logic there even then.

I know my idea of 'traditional family values' doesn’t contain any of the three ‘pillars’ you mention, and the stretch gets even longer.

But, I too, worry about violence. I really do. The following might be relevant - a short story:

http://xmission.com/~psneeley/Personal/Angels.htm

I can't help but remember the reason God destroyed mankind the first time: because the earth was filled with violence.

Genesis 6: 11-13

11 The earth also was corrupt before God, and the earth was filled with violence.

12 And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.

13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.